1610 is a better choice if you work on a lot of documents (it can scale two letter format pages side by side) and 16:9 is the best choice for entertainment (movies
Actualgood argument tbh. As for me i downgraded from 16:9 to 16:10 because somehow it just feels better lol. 16x10 is a blessed ratio in general, if I wasn't blind as fuck I would definitely use it in CS. It does look good in 16:9. I'll keep 4:3 anyway. For me atleast spraying with AK is easier on 16:9.
Thetwo screenshots are taken from the same exact position without moving, after merely changing resolutions in-game. 16:9 in general only extends the visibility of 4:3 (i.e. the top and bottom
169 vs 16:10 - Performance difference. While 16:10 seems to be the new feature that laptops want, is it worth the performance difference over the 16:9 standard .
The32:9 aspect ratio, also known as super ultrawide, is the widest aspect ratio available for gaming monitors. These monitors are essentially two 16:9 monitors side by side, which provides an incredibly immersive gaming experience. They're great for games that have a lot of horizontal movement, such as racing or flight simulators.
Manufacturersare moving from 16:9 to 16:10 because that allows them to increase the screen-to-body ratio: look at the XPS 7390 with a 16:9 screen. The only larger bezel is at the bottom. You can't reduce the depth of the keyboard and the touchpad is already quite small. Its successor the XPS 9300 moved to 16:10.
1610 is an aspect ratio, it does not directly affect FPS in any way. The resolution and FOV do affect FPS. #1 Bad 💀 Motha Apr 9, 2021 @ 9:09pm It would be lesser FPS, not more,
HQ8bQz6. gu87khqc7b.pages.dev/984gu87khqc7b.pages.dev/39gu87khqc7b.pages.dev/536gu87khqc7b.pages.dev/293gu87khqc7b.pages.dev/792gu87khqc7b.pages.dev/66gu87khqc7b.pages.dev/573gu87khqc7b.pages.dev/720gu87khqc7b.pages.dev/877gu87khqc7b.pages.dev/502gu87khqc7b.pages.dev/204gu87khqc7b.pages.dev/283gu87khqc7b.pages.dev/281gu87khqc7b.pages.dev/610gu87khqc7b.pages.dev/311
16 9 vs 16 10 gaming
